Blog article

The first preview version of Ruby 2.4 was released a few days ago. This particular release includes a bunch of new features. Moreover, it introduces some fixes and changes that are not entirely backward compatible. Thus, we need to pay close attention to these differences in this new version of Ruby.

In this post, we’ll focus on some remarkable changes in behavior, so as to better understand how our applications could be affected or improved once we upgrade to Ruby 2.4.

Fixnum and Bignum were unified into Integer

Until Ruby 2.3, we had three different classes representing integer numbers. The Integer class was an abstract class and the parent of the concrete classes Fixnum and Bignum. Small values were represented using the Fixnum class, but if the value exceeded the allowed range, Bignum was used instead.

See the following examples for Ruby 2.3:

irb(main):> 3.class
Fixnum < Integer
irb(main):> 400_000_000_000_000_000_000.class
Bignum < Integer
irb(main):> 3.is_a? Integer
true
irb(main):> 3.is_a? Fixnum
true
irb(main):> 3.is_a? Bignum
false

This behavior changed slightly with Ruby 2.4.0-preview1. The Integer class is now the only concrete one. All integer objects are now instances of Integer. The constants Fixnum and Bignum remain available but they are just aliases for Integer.

Let’s see how that affects the code from the previous example:

irb(main):> 3.class
=> Integer
irb(main):> 400_000_000_000_000_000_000.class
=> Integer
irb(main):> 3.is_a? Integer
=> true
irb(main):> 3.is_a? Fixnum
=> true
irb(main):> 3.is_a? Bignum
=> true

It’s funny to note that in Ruby 2.4, even little numbers such as the integer 3 are “big numbers” as well 😏. Jokes aside, remember that Integer is equal to Fixnum and Bignum and, as a result, Fixnum and Bignum are also aliases.

The unification of the Integer classes was motivated by the argument that Fixnum and Bignum simply constitute an implementation detail to handle integer numbers in Ruby internals. In particular, new people learning the language will find it easier to deal with a unique Integer class.

However, this change may break existing code, so be warned! If you have code that directly relies on the Fixnum or Bignum classes, you may need to double-check your code’s compatibility. As usual, you should verify that the gems in your bundle don’t break given this change. For example, Rails maintainers have done their due diligence and internal references to Fixnum and Bignum have already been removed. Therefore, Rails 5 will be ready for the new Integer behavior in Ruby 2.4.

Case conversion methods work with Unicode

The following case conversion methods were improved upon so that they work better with Unicode characters: upcase, downcase, swapcase and capitalize. These four methods, which belong to the classes String and Symbol, were affected by this change. The similar methods in String that make changes in place (the ones that end with an exclamation mark, such as upcase!) were also updated.

Before Ruby 2.4, case conversion only worked with ASCII characters, having no effect on other characters. See the following Ruby 2.3 example, using a Spanish name with an accent on the first letter:

irb(main):> "ángela".upcase
"áNGELA"
irb(main):> "ángela".capitalize
"ángela"

The á character is not part of the ASCII charset, so case conversions are not applied to this particular letter of the word even though the rest of the ASCII characters are converted. Fortunately, this is now working well in the latest version of Ruby. See how Ruby 2.4.0-preview1 handles it:

irb(main):> "ángela".upcase
=> "ÁNGELA"
irb(main):> "ángela".capitalize
=> "Ángela"

Ángela can now input her name and see it capitalized in a banner or title section of her favorite web application…but only if it is run with Ruby 2.4!

This change can also affect existing code because it is actually altering the language’s behavior. However, we shouldn’t run into many cases where things break. In fact, I feel this change can fix existing errors. Nevertheless, if you are in a situation where this change is somehow problematic, all the affected methods in Ruby 2.4 accept the :ascii symbol as a parameter to force the previous behavior:

irb(main):> "ángela".upcase :ascii
=> "áNGELA"  

Time and DateTime to_time method preserves time zone

This is considered a bug fix, since early Ruby versions did not preserve the time zone of the receiver object when invoking the to_time method. The following demonstrates the issue in Ruby 2.3:

irb(main):> require 'date'
true
irb(main):> time = DateTime.strptime('2016-06-21 PST', '%Y-%m-%d %Z')
#<DateTime: 2016-06-21T00:00:00-08:00 ((2457561j,28800s,0n),-28800s,2299161j)>
irb(main):> time.zone
"-08:00"
irb(main):> time.to_time
2016-06-21 05:00:00 -0300

In the above example, we created a DateTime object that is expressed in the Pacific Standard Time time zone (PST). Unexpectedly, when we convert it to a Time object, its time zone is not preserved. The new object uses the Uruguayan time zone (-03:00), which is my system’s local time zone. Please note that the first value is 0:00 AM PST and the other is 5:00 AM UYT. Both values are equivalent, just expressed in different time zones.

The same code in Ruby 2.4.0-preview1 will result in a new Time object that preserves the original time zone:

irb(main):> require 'date'
=> true
irb(main):> time = DateTime.strptime('2016-06-21 PST', '%Y-%m-%d %Z')
=> #<DateTime: 2016-06-21T00:00:00-08:00 ((2457561j,28800s,0n),-28800s,2299161j)>
irb(main):> time.zone
=> "-08:00"
irb(main):> time.to_time
=> 2016-06-21 00:00:00 -0800

As with the other changes previously mentioned, some existing code may break, so always test thoroughly when upgrading your version of Ruby. As a consequence of this latter change in Ruby, the Rails framework had to be adapted as some related methods are part of their API, including String#to_date. Rails 5 will support Ruby 2.2 and later, so the ActiveSupport.to_time_preserves_timezone config option was added to control how all to_date methods behave, ensuring backward compatibility with previous Ruby versions if said option is set to false. New Rails 5 apps will contain an initializer file including ActiveSupport.to_time_preserves_timezone = true, encouraging the use of the new time zone handling introduced by Ruby 2.4.

Final thoughts

Only some of the changes in behavior introduced in the recently released Ruby 2.4.0-preview1 were discussed in this post. It is worth mentioning that many other features and fixes were implemented in this new version of the language. A more extensive list of additions and changes can be found in the Ruby NEWS file for this version.

We’ve looked at some important changes that are part of this first Ruby 2.4 preview. Without a doubt, these modifications represent improvements to the language, but at the same time these changes in behavior may not be fully compatible with existing code that runs in Ruby 2.3 or earlier. On the other hand, there is little chance we will experience one of the compatibility issues with custom applications code. Some extra work might be needed with gems or third party libraries to avoid problems with Ruby 2.4. We mentioned a few areas of work in Rails to prepare for the new version of Ruby; the Rails team wants to make sure the next major version of the framework, Rails 5, is fully compatible with the latest version of the language.

It’s your turn now! I hope you have the opportunity to try this preview version of Ruby 2.4 and take advantage of the changes it includes. After all, this is open source and the Ruby team is awaiting feedback from developers using the language 😎.

References

Integer class unification
Ruby issue: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12005
Rails fix: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/25056

Unicode changes
Ruby issue: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10085

Timezone handling
Ruby issues: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12189 and https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12271
Rails fix: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/24617

Other resources
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/06/20/ruby-2-4-0-preview1-released/
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v2_4_0_preview1/NEWS
https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1Nh94gv2oTp4_Kg6OgRJY7pRzm53zwBQ0v07_n1sW1Y4/pub
https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1nQZDYtqlK8m2ed0q7nvaFWTOc_yNfvIgYa0Jydocr-o/pub